Comments (2)
i ate this fish yesterday for dinner
We do our best to use images that are open source. If you feel we have used an image of yours inappropriately please let us know and we will fix it.
Our writing can be punchy but we do our level best to ensure the material is accurate. If you believe we have made a mistake, please let us know.
If you are planning to see an artwork, please keep in mind that while the art we cover is held in permanent collections, pieces are sometimes removed from display for renovation or traveling exhibitions.
Contributor
I don’t know about you guys but when I see this painting, I see a backwards, slightly pornographic mermaid and begin to wonder if I'm seeing clearly. This was Magritte’s intention, though. He created this mermaid-out-of-water to challenge the preconceived idea of mermaids in our minds, which - let’s face it - is the scene in The Little Mermaid when Ariel sings “Part of Your World” and her beautiful red hair is blowing in the sea breeze. I think it’s safe to say that this painting is nothing like The Little Mermaid.
In true Surrealist fashion, Magritte takes an everyday image and twists it into something disturbing and ominous. The fact that this "mermaid" is laying on the sand, looking lost and helpless makes us want to help her up and say “Go home mermaid, you’re drunk.” As I’m sure some of you have felt whilst intoxicated, this mermaid does not belong on land or in water and is just too naked for us to feel at all comfortable while looking at her. Seriously, why don’t you just get up and walk away?
So what’s the point of this anatomically confused mermaid, you ask? Well, it is perhaps because Magritte is pushing upon us something that he knows is fishy (sea what I did there?). Another point of the painting is perhaps to point out the absurdity of the male gaze. It acts as a parody of the fact that men are only interested in sex and even if women had the head of a fish, it just wouldn’t even matter. Who needs a real woman anyway, right? Arms are definitely overrated. One great misogynist once stated that this is “a practical man’s mermaid.” (wait, what?) I’m not exactly sure he considered how horribly that could go for him.
At the end of the day, our dear little messed up Ariel just can't be a part of our world, no matter how many princes she tries to kiss.
i ate this fish yesterday for dinner
I like this piece because it is very interesting. It combines a man and a fish by drawing a man-fish. However, it is the opposite of the mermaid we usually know. It uses the head of a fish combined with the legs of a man, instead of the body of a man and the tail of a fish.