Comments (3)
Hello! I agree art is subjective and can see why one might find this photo interesting. What I was trying to get at was the moral (and perhaps legal) implications using someone's corpse as a prop, without permission. I thought, how I would feel if this was my loved one being used? I also wonder about the ethics of Hirst making money off of the sale of the work. (As for my desperation to be relevant, I'm afraid I lost that battle long ago lol)
Couldn"t say it better.
You sound absolutely desperate to be relevant. Art is subjective, and I think this photo is one of a kind and interesting. I'm quite surprised the senior editor doesn't know how to read into artwork "or whatever". #cringe